Kim McCarthy, whose child attends Marco Forster Middle School in San Juan Capistrano, raises some concerns about the school’s national identity. The Orange County Register has re-printed McCarthy’s letter to the Capistrano Unified Board of Trustees online. Here it is:
TO: Trustees Ellen Addonizio, Anna Bryson, Larry Christensen, Ken Maddox, Sue Palazzo, Duane Stiff, Mike Darnold
Thank you to the trustees for omitting on the blue request to speak card, the requirement of stating your children’s name and school they attended. I can tell you first hand my involvement in the original recall landed me and my family’s names on the enemies list. As a result, I was reluctant to speak before the previous Board majority.
My concern tonight is this: For the last 2 years my daughter has attended Marco Forster Middle School, and before her my son attended Marco. Consequently, I have spent a significant amount of time at Marco, yet I have never been comfortable there. Why? Because this school is operated as if it is a Mexican Public School, not an American Public School.
• The Mexican flag is painted on the multi-purpose room wall next to the portrait of a Mexican man with a quote in Spanish.
• Many signs throughout the school at various events are in Spanish.
• Most everyone behind the office counter is often electing to speak Spanish.
• Many a time have I been sitting in the office when the principal walks in, Carrie Bertini, and she is choosing to speak in Spanish instead of English as well.
• The messages on the phones are in Spanish, all of the paperwork is in both Spanish and English.
• On parent teacher night when parents only are requested, many of the Latinos bring their children anyway, as interpretors.
• An awards ceremony at the end of the school year was given in English and then parents had to painstakingly sit through it interpreted by teachers in Spanish to the gasps of the many English-speaking parents.
• Subsequently, due to the way in which this school is run, my daughter and her friends say Spanish is spoken by the majority of Latino’s in the hallway who are perfectly capable of speaking English. Why not, when the principle is doing it and no one is telling them any different! Is this promoting assimilation? NO, it promotes divisiveness!
There are 140 languages spoken by California’s children, is the CUSD prepared to include them on all paperwork, the phone system, speak their language at awards ceremonies and represent their flags on the wall as well?
What happened to PROP. 227, “REQUIRING ALL PUBLIC SCHOOL INSTRUCTION TO BE CONDUCTED IN ENGLISH?” I consider anything that goes on in the public school system as some form of instruction.
Even more disturbing, why is the Catholic organization CHEC, allowed to promote themselves using our public school system? This is a religious organization targeting one race in our public school. Is this even legal? If so, why don’t they make a check out to the CUSD Foundation for ALL of the children of CUSD?
Why is the principle of Marco, Carrie Bertini, getting involved in San Juan Capistrano’s local politics and attending the 5/6/2008 City Council meeting to speak on behalf of the Catholic organization CHEC when residents of SJC were opposing the city renewing CHEC’s license to operate in one of our residential neighborhoods? And let me make it very clear, because I have it on tape, she introduced herself as the principal of Marc Forster Middle School and identified herself once more during her speech that she was the principal. Miss Bertini gave out her own statistics, crediting her schools relationship with CHEC for a drop in expulsion.
The divisiveness at Marco is disturbingly out of control and it appears, is being perpetuated by the principal.
Bottom line:
• I am asking you, the board of trustees, to enforce the laws of The United States of America and PROP 227 at Marco and throughout the district.
• Please do not allow the Mexican flag to remain on the walls at Marco.
• Do not allow any one religion to single out one race of children and use our public school system to promote it and their organization.
• Please ask Marco Principal Carrie Bertini to stop promoting the use of the Spanish language thus enabling Latinos to create Mexico within our public school system. Maybe then these students will better assimilate, which in turn will foster better relations all around.
What is happening at Marco is unacceptable. I and many other parents and children are tired of it and want it to end but we need your help to do it. I’m asking for your intervention.
Thank you,
Kim McCarthy
Here is the mural to which McCarthery refers:

Source: OC Weekly
Superintendent A. Woodrow Carter’s written response is here. Since it is a pdf file, I can’t copy and paste it on the blog like I did with McCarthy’s letter.
I myself am a product of the Capistrano Unified School District. Every school I attended throughout my K-12 education was a CUSD school. While I paid little attention to the demographics of my elementary classrooms to comment on assimilation as a a kindergartener, I paid enough attention to it to notice the significant change in racial composition, and the increase in Hispanic students in particular once I graduated from High School. Though Superintendent Carter minimizes the concerns raised by McCarthy, the parent’s letter provides important examples of the continuing need to foster a culture of assimilation in our public schools.
Carter asserts that all classroom instruction is done in English, while hallway and office conversations in Spanish do not violate Proposition 227, the law that requires public school instruction to be conducted in English. While one has every right to speak whatever language one wants, students should be encouraged to speak English. When school administrators and staff choose to speak Spanish most of the time, they set a poor example for the students that may be less inclined to speak English. Carter further reveals that PTSA newsletters are translated in Spanish, providing fewer opportunities for students to learn English. Admittedly, I rarely read the PTSA newsletters that were mailed home, but consistent English exposure in and out of the school environment can only help an English learner.
Lastly, Superintendent Carter defends the Mexican themed mural depicting Mexican President Benito Juárez as an appropriate response to a hate incident that occurred on campus. The mural additionally features a quote from Juárez, written in both Spanish and English. It reads:
“Entre los individuos, como entre las naciones, el respeto al derecho ajeno es la paz.” “Among individuals, as among nations, respect for the rights of others is peace.”
If you want to promote peace and tolerance, why not use this quote: “Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” And it just so happens to be from an American President, no less. Carter finds the mural to be a beautiful depiction of “Two cultures coming together to create beauty and harmony out of adversity.” That may be true, but it certainly doesn’t depict national solidarity or the principle of E pluribus unum—things that often take a backseat to lessons in “diversity.”
Two cultures can harmoniously come together, but under which principles and virtues do they unite? While Juárez’s words appear to echo Jefferson or Lincoln, one would think that an American school would echo the words of an American leader. According to the superintendent, the mural was designed by the students. I guess they were all absent during the lesson on our nation’s founding.